The New World Order (NWO) refers to an ancient plan, global and multi-generational in scope to control (enslave) the entire world under a Luciferian (Anti-Christ) Global system.
NWO Quotes
- Click on images to enlarge
New world Order Quote Compilation
New World Order Quotes
“For a long time I felt that FDR had developed many thoughts and ideas that were his own to benefit this country, the United States. But, he didn’t. Most of his thoughts, his political ammunition, as it were, were carefully manufactured for him in advanced by the Council on Foreign Relations-One World Money group. Brilliantly, with great gusto, like a fine piece of artillery, he exploded that prepared “ammunition” in the middle of an unsuspecting target, the American people, and thus paid off and returned his internationalist political support… “The UN is but a long-range, international banking apparatus clearly set up for financial and economic profit by a small group of powerful One-World revolutionaries, hungry for profit and power. … “The depression was the calculated ‘shearing’ of the public by the World Money powers, triggered by the planned sudden shortage of supply of call money in the New York money market….The One World Government leaders and their ever close bankers have now acquired full control of the money and credit machinery of the U.S. via the creation of the privately owned Federal Reserve Bank.” ~ CURTIS DALL, FDR’s son-in-law as quoted in his book, My Exploited Father-in-Law
“The real truth of the matter is, as you and I know, that a financial element in the larger centers has owned the Government ever since the days of Andrew Jackson.” ~ A letter written by FDR to Colonel House, November 21st, l933
“The powers of financial capitalism had another far reaching aim, nothing less than to create a world system of financial control in private hands able to dominate the political system of each country and the economy of the world as a whole. This system was to be controlled in a feudalist fashion by the central banks of the world acting in concert, by secret agreements, arrived at in frequent private meetings and conferences. The apex of the system was the Bank for International Settlements in Basle, Switzerland, a private bank owned and controlled by the worlds’ central banks which were themselves private corporations. The growth of financial capitalism made possible a centralization of world economic control and use of this power for the direct benefit of financiers and the indirect injury of all other economic groups.” Tragedy and Hope: A History of The World in Our Time (Macmillan Company, 1966,) PROFESSOR CARROLL QUIGLEY of Georgetown University, highly esteemed by his former student, WILLIAM JEFFERSON BLYTHE CLINTON.
- My country’s history, Mr. President, tells us that it is possible to fashion unity while cherishing diversity, that common action is possible despite the variety of races, interests, and beliefs we see here in this chamber. Progress and peace and justice are attainable. So we say to all peoples and governments: Let us fashion together a new world order. ~ Henry Kissinger, address for the UN General Assembly (October 1975), printed in A Dangerous Place(1980) by Daniel Patrick Moynihan
- NAFTA will represent the most creative step toward a new world order taken by any group of countries since the end of the Cold War, and the first step toward an even larger vision of a free-trade zone for the entire Western Hemisphere…. NAFTA is not a conventional trade agreement, but the architecture of a new international system. ~ Henry Kissinger, “With NAFTA, U.S. finally creates a new world order” in The Los Angeles Times (18 July 1993), p. M2
- “What Congress will have before it is not a conventional trade agreement but the architecture of a new international system….a first step toward a new world order.” ~ HENRY KISSINGER 1993 – July 18: CFR member and Trilateralist writes in The Los Angeles Times concerning NAFTA:
- “If we do not follow the dictates of our inner moral compass and stand up for human life, then his lawlessness will threaten the peace and democracy of the emerging new world order we now see, this long dreamed-of vision we’ve all worked toward for so long.” ~ PRESIDENT GEORGE BUSH (January 1991)
- “Whatever the price of the Chinese Revolution, it has obviously succeeded not only in producing more efficient and dedicated administration, but also in fostering high morale and community of purpose. THE SOCIAL EXPERIMENT IN CHINA under Chairman Mao’s leadership is one of the most important and successful in human history.” ~ DAVID ROCKEFELLER, statement in 1973 about Mao Tse-tung: (NY Times 8-10-73)
~ On May 4, 1993, Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) president Leslie Gelb said on The Charlie Rose Show that:
“… you [Charlie Rose] had me on [before] to talk about the New World Order! I talk about it all the time. It’s one world now. The Council [CFR] can find, nurture, and begin to put people in the kinds of jobs this country needs. And that’s going to be one of the major enterprises of the Council under me.”
“The New World Order will have to be built from the bottom up rather than from the top down…but in the end run around national sovereignty, eroding it piece by piece will accomplish much more than the old fashioned frontal assault.” ~ CFR member RICHARD GARDNER, writing in the April l974 issue of the CFR’s journal, Foreign Affairs.
“The United Nations, he told an audience at Harvard University, ‘has not been able–nor can it be able–to shape a new world order which events so compellingly demand.’ … The new world order that will answer economic, military, and political problems, he said, ‘urgently requires, I believe, that the United States take the leadership among all free peoples to make the underlying concepts and aspirations of national sovereignty truly meaningful through the federal approach.'” ~ GOV. NELSON ROCKEFELLER of New York, in an article entitled “Rockefeller Bids Free Lands Unite: Calls at Harvard for Drive to Build New World Order” — The New York Times (February 1962)
~ 1962 – March 10 State Department Study Memorandum No. 7, “A World Effectively Controlled by the United Nations, ” written by CFR member Lincoln Bloomfield, in which he states: “A world effectively controlled by the United Nations is one in which “world government” would come about through the establishment of supranational institutions, characterized by mandatory universal membership and some ability to employ physical force….(But) if the communist dynamic was greatly abated, the West might lose whatever incentive it has for world government” It looks as if now the “communist menace” has been replaced by the “terrorist menace”. And of course they can switch back to the communist menace or any other kind of menace whenever they want to.
~ 1968 – October: In this edition of the CFR’s Foreign Affairs is an article, “Asia After Vietnam,” by Richard Nixon (CFR member 1961-1965), in which he writes of nations’ disposition “to evolve regional approaches to development needs and to the evolution of a new world order.”
~ 1977 – The Third Try at World Order by Harlan Cleveland, CFR member is published. He calls for “changing Americans’ attitudes and institutions”; for “complete disarmament (except for international soldiers)”; for “fairer distribution of worldly goods through a new International Economic Order”; and for “international standard for individual entitlement to food, health and education.”
- Parallel with the process of wars, hostility, and alienation of peoples and countries, another process, just as objectively conditioned, was in motion and gaining force: The process of the emergence of a mutually connected and integral world. Further world progress is now possible only through the search for a consensus of all mankind, in movement toward a new world order.… The world community must learn to shape and direct the process in such a way as to preserve civilization, to make it safe for all and more pleasant for normal life. ~ Mikhail Gorbachev, address to the UN General Assembly (7 December 1988), printed in Mikhail Gorbachev : Prophet of Change(2011)
“The world is governed by very different personages from what is imagined by those who are not behind the scenes.” ~ BENJAMIN DISRAELI, first Prime Minister of England, in a novel he published in 1844 called Coningsby, the New Generation
- The minds of our comfortable and influential ruling-class people refuse to accept the plain intimation that their time is over, that the Balance of Power and uncontrolled business methods cannot continue, and that Hitler, like the Hohenzollerns, is a mere offensive pustule on the face of a deeply ailing world. To get rid of him and his Nazis will be no more a cure for the world’s ills than scraping will cure measles. The disease will manifest itself in some new eruption. It is the system of nationalist individualism and uncoordinated enterprise that is the world’s disease, and it is the whole system that has to go. ~ G. Wells, The New World Order(1940), Ch. 1: “The End of an Age” (p. 10 in the 2007 reprint, ISBN 1599868431
- Countless people, from maharajas to millionaires and from pukkha sahibs to pretty ladies, will hate the new world order, be rendered unhappy by the frustration of their passions and ambitions through its advent and will die protesting against it. ~ G. Wells, The New World Order(1940), Ch. 12: “World Order in Being”
“… when the struggle seems to be drifting definitely towards a world social democracy, there may still be very great delays and disappointments before it becomes an efficient and beneficent world system. Countless people – will hate the new world order – and will die protesting against it. When we attempt to evaluate its promise, we have to bear in mind the distress of a generation or so of malcontents, many of them quite gallant and gracefullooking people.” ~ H. G. WELLS, in his book entitled “The New World Order” (1939).
- The revolutionary movement which began in 1789 in the Cercle Social, which in the middle of its course had as its chief representatives Leclerc and Roux, and which finally with Babeuf’s conspiracy was temporarily defeated, gave rise to the communist idea which Babeuf’s friend Buonarroti re-introduced in France after the Revolution of 1830. This idea, consistently developed, is the idea of the new world order. ~ Karl Marx, in The Holy Family(1845).
- The peace conference has assembled. It will make the most momentous decisions in history, and upon these decisions will rest the stability of the new world order and the future peace of the world. ~ Letter from association president M. C. Alexander in the journal International Conciliation(January 1919)
- There are two rules of war that have not yet been invalidated by the new world order. The first rule is that the belligerent nation must be fairly sure that its actions will make things better; the second rule is that the belligerent nation must be more or less certain that its actions won’t make things worse. ~ Martin Amis, “The Palace of the End”, The Guardian(4 March 2003)
- Today Europe can propose the principles and rules that will shape a new global order. ~ José Manuel Durão Barroso, (21 October 2008), European Parliament, in Sarkozy calls for EU “Economic Government” (also includes: Barroso, Farage, de Villiers).
- We are indeed living historic moments. The kind of occasion where the crisis calls in to question all certainties and minds are more open to change. These are very special moments and they are not happening everyday. We have to understand that it’s really one of those moments where there is some higher plasticity and then where we can make a real change ~ José Manuel Durão Barroso, (21 October 2008)
- The old world order changed when this war-storm broke. The old international order passed away as suddenly, as unexpectedly, and as completely as if it had been wiped out by a gigantic flood, by a great tempest, or by a volcanic eruption. The old world order died with the setting of that day’s sun and a new world order is being born while I speak, with birth-pangs so terrible that it seems almost incredible that life could come out of such fearful suffering and such overwhelming sorrow. ~ Nicholas Murray Butler in a speech to the Union League of Philadelphia (28 November 1915), printed in A World in Ferment(1918)
- Two centuries ago our forefathers brought forth a new nation; now we must join with others to bring forth a new world order. ~ Henry Steele Commagerwriting for the World Affairs Council of Philadelphia in A Declaration of INTERdependence (1976) printed in We the Other People (1976) by Philip Sheldon Foner, ed.
- The hope for the foreseeable future lies, not in building up a few ambitious central institutions of universal membership and general jurisdiction as was envisaged at the end of the last war, but rather in the much more decentralized, disorderly and pragmatic process of inventing or adapting institutions … as the necessity for cooperation is perceived by the relevant nations.… In short, the “house of world order” will have to be built from the bottom up rather than from the top down…. [A]n end run around national sovereignty, eroding it piece by piece, will accomplish much more than the old-fashioned frontal assault. ~ Richard Gardner, “The Hard Road to World Order”, in Foreign Affairs(April 1974), p. 558
- In the final analysis, the South’s plea for justice, equity, and democracy in the global society cannot be dissociated from its pursuit of these goals within its own societies. Commitment to democratic values respect for fundamental rights—particularly the right to dissent, fair treatment for minorities, concern for the poor and underprivileged, probity in public life, willingness to settle disputes without recourse to war—all these cannot but influence world opinion and increase the South’s chances of securing a new world order. ~ Julius Nyerere, The Challenge to the South: The Report of the South Commission(August 1990)
- It’s a true New Deal at a global scale that is necessary. An ecological and economical New Deal. In the name of France, I call all the states to gather, in order to forge the new world order of the twenty first century. ~ C’est un véritable New Deal à l’échelle planétaire qui est nécessaire. Un New Deal écologique et économique. Au nom de la France, j’appelle tous les États à se réunir, pour fonder le nouvel ordre mondial du XXIème siècle[…] ~ French president Nicolas Sarkozy, in a speech before UN general assembly, (25 September 2007)
- We are not going to achieve a new world order without paying for it in blood as well as in words and money. ~ Arthur Schlesinger, Jr., in “Back to the Womb? Isolationism’s New Threat” in Foreign Affairs(1995 Jul/Aug)
- We believe we are creating the beginning of a new world order coming out of the collapse of the US-Soviet antagonisms. ~ Brent Scowcroft, in “Bush’s Talk of ‘New World Order’: Foreign Policy Tool or Mere Slogan?” in The Washington Post(1991 May 26) on page A31
- A great war requires some great military powers, ready and eager to risk all. The New World Disorder lacks the muscle for conventional warfare. The New World Order has plenty of muscle but a problem finding foes to war with. ~ Bruce Sterling, Tomorrow Now: Envisioning the Next Fifty Years(2002), St. 7: “Mere Oblivion”, ISBN 0679463224, p. 258
“We can see beyond the present shadows of war in the Middle East to a new world order where the strong work together to deter and stop aggression. This was precisely Franklin Roosevelt’s and Winston Churchill’s vision for peace for the post-war period.” ~ RICHARD GEPHARDT, in The Wall Street Journal (September 1990)
1934 — The Externalization of the Hierarchy by Alice A. Bailey is published. Bailey is an occultist, whose works are channeled from a spirit guide, the Tibetan Master [demon spirit] Djwahl Kuhl. Bailey uses the phrase “points of light” in connection with a “New Group of World Servers” and claims that 1934 marks the beginning of “the organizing of the men and women… group work of a new order… [with] progress defined by service… the world of the Brotherhood… the Forces of Light… [and] out of the spoliation of all existing culture and civilization, the new world order must be built.”
- The book is published by the Lucis Trust, incorporated originally in New York as the Lucifer Publishing Company. Lucis Trustis a United Nations NGO and has been a major player at the recent U.N. summits. Later Assistant Secretary General of the U.N. Robert Mueller would credit the creation of his World Core Curriculum for education to the underlying teachings of Djwahl Kuhl via Alice Bailey’s writings on the subject.
- The statement has been made that Those who constitute the inner government of the world, or the so-called planetary Hierarchy, are working to facilitate the entry of the very ideals and aims into the consciousness of the race. These ideals and aims are characteristics of the New Age.… This group will provide an international unit, made up of intelligent men of good will, which must inevitably control world destiny and bring about world peace and thus organize the new world order.
- Alice Bailey, in Esoteric Psychology(1942).
NWO Headlines
More and more the term “New World Order” is being brought out into the mainstream news media.
* Click on images to enlarge
CFR - The World Order is Dead. Long Live World Order
An excerpt from the CFR article above:
The world is at a historic inflection point. Can the so-called liberal world order—which many believe has helped deliver seven decades of peace, prosperity, and stability—survive the litany of challenges it faces today? And how can institutions and norms that have long facilitated international cooperation function in an era that many see as defined by great power competition? To develop tentative answers to these questions, CFR hosted the eighth annual conference of the Council of Councils (CoC) in Washington, DC, from May 5 to 7, 2019. Forty-three delegates from twenty-three countries representing twenty-five think tanks discussed the future of world order, the catastrophic risk of nuclear weapons, the challenges of rapid urbanization, the future of freedom worldwide, and the ongoing conflict in Yemen.
Four takeaways stand out:
1. The U.S.-led order is spent. Since the end of World War II, the United States has pursued its global interests by constructing and maintaining international economic institutions, security alliances, and liberal political norms—three legs that hold up the liberal world order. These institutions, norms, and rules mediated relations among countries, helped prevent conflict between major powers, and promoted the spread of democracy and human rights. The United States under President Donald J. Trump is rejecting and undermining basic tenets of all three legs. Current U.S. disinterest leaves its continued leadership—and even the preservation—of that order in doubt. Every time the United States abandons or weakens a multilateral arrangement that it helped to establish, other countries take that as an indicator of their own freedom to flout shared rules and norms.
2. The world order is cracking and there is no clear way forward. Aside from U.S. neglect and abuse, the world order faces three main challenges. First, it does not reflect the new distribution of global power. China, Russia, and other countries do not see the structure of the order as legitimate, and they will continue to contest it. Second, globalization is exacerbating economic inequality and financial imbalances, which policymakers are failing to remedy. Third, transformative technologies are disrupting labor markets and political systems. Populist movements have exploited anxieties created by uncertainty and fear of “the other,” agitating for more insular economies and closed societies. This backlash against globalization, combined with the resurgence of state industrial policy and large, market-distorting economies, challenges the functioning of the open world order and imperils the design of any new one. Moreover, while some countries prefer a world order based only on a limited set of basic rules, others want the core of any order to reflect the values of democracy and human rights. Bridging this ideological gap will be extremely difficult.
3. Middle powers need to take more global responsibility and buttress the world order. As the United States takes a step back, middle powers need to step up to sustain the world order in which they are stakeholders. Without clear rules, middle powers are lost in a Thucydidean world in which the strong do as they can and the middling do as they must. In a paper written for the CoC conference, Michael Fullilove, president of the Lowy Institute, proposes[PDF] principles that could inform the foreign policy of many middle powers: stand up for their values, call out challengers to the international order, be exemplars in following international rules, reinforce connections among themselves and stand up a new concert of like-minded countries, and, most importantly, bolster their own capabilities to be responsible global partners. Ultimately, however, international orders cannot be created or sustained by middle powers alone. They are maintained or broken by great powers. So Washington and Beijing will have a large say in the future of world order.
4. A failure of political leadership is darkening the world’s future. Today’s problems are linked to the current quality of global leadership. The absence of strong, principled, and effective leaders willing to do the right thing—regardless of short-term political calculations–is palpable. History turns in part based on vast impersonal forces, but individuals still matter enormously. The formation of the post-World War II order, for instance, was not inevitable. It was contingent on individual events and the instincts of great men and women. Preserving and reforming the world order will require exceptional leadership.
Is the world order in as bad of shape as everyone says, and the above points imply? Perhaps not. For many years, the United States has seen itself as an exceptional or “exemptionalist” power, able to ignore norms it claims to uphold, much as Trump is doing now. Yet the world order has survived. The current order is in dire need of repair, and Trump has identified many of its shortcomings. His solutions, however, leave much to be desired. His “ready, shoot, aim” approach undermines prosperity and security. His administration’s pursuit of narrowly conceived national interests is laying waste to world order.
In the coming years, the Trump administration’s disdain of global rules and could have drastic implications for U.S. security alliances and liberalism writ large. The problem for the rest of the world is that the United States is still the most powerful country militarily, imports the most goods, and maintains the world’s reserve currency. Building alternatives to the world order as we know it, particularly the economic order, will be difficult. However, other countries are already starting to refuse to play along with Trump’s bluster.
Instead of abandoning the world order that has served most of the world well, the United States should seek to preserve and prolong that order—the essential parts, at least. No one pretends that the liberal world order is perfect. To paraphrase Winston Churchill, the liberal world order is the worst form of order except for all those others that have been tried.
Technocracy
A presentation on the Trilateral Commission and Technocracy by Patrick Wood. This presentation covers material about the globalist goal of a new economic world order.
The Tower of Babel
The Tower of Babel was constructed by Nimrod, king of Babylon. All ancient mystery schools, cults, and eastern religions trace back to the ancient civilization of Babylon. Babylon was the first great civilization of the antediluvian world or post-flood world. The abominations of the Egyptians and other ancient civilizations all came from Babylon. According to the Book of Genesis written by Moses, Nimrod built the Tower of Babel to exalt himself above God. It is disputed whether this was just a physical tower or is a metaphor for something else. Nimrod is known as constructing the first “world order” in which he had set up a totalitarian kingdom over most of the earth where humans were in complete slavery. In the occult, Nimrod is worshipped as a god and his impact has very much carried over into the modern world. This can be seen throughout history as his birthday of December 25th has long been celebrated. Nimrod is regarded as the sun god and in Babylonian mythology, Nimrod was resurrected as the “son” Tammuz. Nimrod’s wife and mother was Semiramis. In Egyptian mythology, Nimrod is replaced by Osiris and Horus and Semiramis is replaced by Isis.
The Romans also had their own sun god. To save the Roman Empire, Constantine formed the Roman Catholic Church which then merged their pagan beliefs with watered down Christianity and persecuted all those who did not bow to the Roman Emperor whose title changed to Pope. It is besides the point whether or not practicing Catholics understand this or not, but the Roman Catholic Church as an organization does not worship Jesus but rather has renamed the sun god (son god) to Jesus. Through traditions, doctrines, symbolism, history, child abuse, murder of millions of Christians, burning of Bibles, and cover ups, that the Roman Catholic Church’s hierarchy does indeed still practice Babylonian occult mysticism. The Catholic Church is not Christian. This will be dissected in another post.
Another name for the sun god worshipped throughout the ages and in the Roman Catholic Church is Baal. This is the god that the Old Testament warns over and over, not to pass your children through the fire which means not to sacrifice your children to Baal. This is what the Egyptians did, and as Moses led the Israelites out of captivity from Egypt, many of the Israelites turned back to Egypt and burned their children in the fire because they did not want anything to do with Moses and living righteous. They thought it better and easier to serve other gods. God had to then destroy the Israelites who did this to keep them from polluting all the tribes and so the Israelites could make it to their promise land of Israel. However, God was merciful and did not destroy all the Israelites for their wickedness but rather provided a way out for them to repent. The same Israelites who turned on Moses, are the same Israelites who killed the prophets that God had sent them and who later crucified Jesus. There is still a large sect of Jews who say they practice what is written in the Old Testament but really study the Babylonian Talmud and the Kabbalah which is Jewish Babylonian Occult Mysticism. Jesus told the pharisees or the rabbis that on the outside they appeared clean but on the inside they were filled with filthiness and hypocrisy. This is seen all over today with the hierarchy of many religions. The religious leaders are often far more wicked than they appear. Wolves in sheep’s skin, if you will. Jesus told the Pharisees that they are like their fathers which killed the prophets and who worship God in vain by their traditions (Babylonian). Jesus called them children of Satan and in the Apostle John’s vision of Jesus, written in the Book of Revelation, Jesus warned John about those who call themselves Jews but lie and are really the synagogue of Satan. So, we can see that these Babylonian cults persist very much into the modern world and have a great impact on the world. These cults are flaunted out in the open for the public to see yet remains widely under the radar of the general population. This is explored in more detail in other posts.